Member (as defined by Section A of the Code of Conduct):
Those members accepted by the Institute as a Full Member (MCIAT), Fellow Member (FCIAT), an Associate member (ACIAT) or a student member.
Affiliates (as defined by Section B of the Code of Conduct):
Architectural Technology professionals who:
If the Conduct Committee determines that the member/affiliate does have a case to answer against any of the clauses/sub-clauses that you have raised against them in your complaint, this will then proceed to a Conduct Hearing.
Complaint details — project related complaint (Complaints submitted by those who have appointed a member or affiliate to work on their project and have been affected by any actions resulting from the member’s or affiliate’s professional conduct.)
(If the complaint is not related to a specific project, please go to Section 3b)
Complaints submitted by those who have not had a contract or have not employed a member/affiliate of the Institute for their project, and believe that they have been affected by any actions resulting from the member’s/affiliate’s professional conduct.
For example, but not limited to, employees against their employer, employer against employeee, a third party stakeholder to the project or a fellow professional.
If you are unable to access the document you require, please contact the Practice Department.
NB. — this information must be indicated here. If the details of the Code of Conduct are not stated the complaint will be rejected.
*Where a complaint is raised in more than one name, all parties are required to provide an online signature and date. It will be sent to other parties if required.